Status Quo Maintenance Reconsidered: Changing or Incomplete Preferences?*
نویسنده
چکیده
After reviewing the evidence for status quo maintenance (SQM), I consider how to reconcile SQM with traditional consumer theory. Behavioural economists usually let agents’ preferences change as a function of their endowments, treating the same person with different endowments as a set of distinct agents. Many properties of preferences then become immune to empirical test and it becomes impossible to judge whether an agent’s decisions make the agent better or worse off. This impedes prediction of when decision rules are likely to change. SQM can alternatively be explained with unchanging preferences if preferences are incomplete. SQM is then consistent with self-interest and there is no reason why it should not persist.
منابع مشابه
Welfare economics with status quo bias: a policy paralysis problem and cure
To analyze welfare economics with status quo bias, we identify each agent with the incomplete preference relation defined by the preference judgments that hold at all of the agent’s status quo points. Although the welfare theorems of general equilibrium theory continue to hold, the set of Pareto optima can be very large. For generic economies, almost every Pareto optimum sits amid an open set o...
متن کاملAmendment Voting with Incomplete Preferences : A Revealed Preference Approach to Robust Identification ∗
We study the outcome of the amendment voting procedure based on a potentially incomplete preference relation. A decision-maker evaluates candidates in a list and iteratively updates her choice by comparing the status-quo to the next candidate. She favors the status-quo when the two candidates are incomparable according to her underlying preference. Developing a revealed preference approach, we ...
متن کاملStatus Quo Bias under Uncertainty: An Experimental Study∗
Individuals’ tendency to stick to the current state of affairs, known as the status quo bias, has been widely documented over the past 30 years. Yet, the determinants of this phenomenon remain elusive. Following the intuition suggested by Bewley (1986), we conduct a systematic experiment exploring the role played by different types of uncertainty on the emergence of the bias. We find no bias wh...
متن کاملIncomplete preferences and rational intransitivity of choice
Do violations of classical rationality theory imply that agents are acting against their self-interest? To answer this question, we investigate whether completeness and transitivity necessarily hold when agents choose outcome rationally—that is, their choice sequences do not lead to dominated outcomes. We show that, because of the danger of money pumps and other manipulations, outcome rationali...
متن کاملThe Effect of Ambiguity on Status Quo Bias: An Experimental Study∗
We conduct an experiment to determine the effect of ambiguity on status quo bias. We find no evidence of the bias in the absence of ambiguity and when ambiguity is present both in the status quo option and the alternative. We do find evidence for status quo bias under asymmetric presence of ambiguity, i.e. when the status quo option is non-ambiguous and the alternative is, or when the status qu...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2004